“By 2035 2 million more people will live in the bay Area”  That is a prediction that warrants some thought, made by the GreenBelt Alliance, the preeminent advocate for open spaces in the bay area.  The SF Chron had a good piece on them Thursday, one worth a quick read for those of us who build and remodel houses.  They recently put out a brochure/roadmap to sustainable urban growth…the main thrust being that “The Bay Area can accommodate all its projected growth in existing cities and towns”  That is a bold statement, but one I agree with.  From a remodelers perspective, I know how much underutilized space there is in existing housing stocks…if those efficiencies were captured through sustainable rebuilding practices it would make a significant impact on future housing needs.  GBA’s prescription focuses more on vacant lots and such, but I would add that existing structures have much to contribute as well if voids & dead zones like extra long garages could be reconfigured into usable spaces.

Along those lines I toured a very pretty green remodel in Noe Valley the other day, 3961 25th Street.  A very smartly done home I first saw over on socketsite, the project oozed good taste, individuality, and flair.  2.8 large is a pretty hefty price point, so I am interested to see how things shake out as it is in contract atm.  It is a good example of how existing housing stock can be reconfigured for more modern, sustainable living.

HS

{ 0 comments }

There has been a spate of greener construction coming on line in San Francisco.  I toured a few yesterday on the SFAR’s Tuesday Tour, and one of the standouts, represented by Barbagelata Real Estate, is the Arden Homes Development located in West Portal.  It is an interesting block of 7 new homes constructed in the former urban grove of the Arden Woods Retirement / Spiritual Healing Center off Wawona Street.  I am still torn over the loss of the grove –  there are so few urban forests, and this really was a majestic stand of beautiful old trees.  But the flip side is 7 homes built within the city limits, close to public transportation, walking distance to shops, restaurants and other amenities, and constructed with some green features.  In the end I suppose it was the right decision to build here, but I will miss the grove.

The homes themselves are nice.  They have a number of Sustainable Features that are an honest if not 100% stab at green building (Of the 3 toilets I saw, only one was dual flush…why not all three I wonder?), on demand hot water (not sustainable imho), Trex Decking (decent), solar photovoltaic panels (good), energy star appliances & bathroom fans, (applause), etc, etc.

I am happy to see developers give a nod to green building, though much props also must go to Mayor Newsom whose advocacy of green building principles mandated this kind of thinking in new construction.  Only mandated action through legislation will force people to build this way.  And it really must be mandated in the building code otherwise we will continue to ignore real environmental costs associated with buildings until the balance becomes so great, our children can’t pay the interest and the planet gets foreclosed on.

More green building reviews to come soon.

{ 2 comments }

I was reading the paper the other day about home pools, a household icon of the 50’s that still plagues neighborhoods today.  Don’t get me wrong, I like to swim, and lounging by the pool, partaking in the occasional ogle, isn’t the worst way to spend a hot afternoon.  No, I am talking more about the home pool, the chemical filled holes in the backyard that are used not nearly as much as people thought they might, like a nice pair of Manolo shoes or an Armani suit.

There are 958,000 public and private pools in the state of California.  If a tiny pool uses 30,000 gallons to fill, that is at least 285,000,000,000 gallons of water at any given moment, and that is a low number since many many pools are bigger than thirty thousand gallons.  How many millions of gallons of chemicals to keep that water “clean”?  How many of those pools are left to fester and become breeding grounds for mosquitoes?  Now in some places, where it is oppressively hot I can see why you might want one – but wanting isn’t a good enough reason when talking about sustainable living.  The environmental costs for private pools are huge.  Pools no longer add to a home’s value like they may have 30 + years ago.  With so many other options, like beautiful new public pools, the home pool just doesn’t make sense for sustainable builders.  How do you justify the costs in terms of water use and pollution?  I just do not see it.

And on to fireplaces.  Another fixture of the modern home, who doesn’t love a nice fireplace?  Well, me for one.  Honestly, ask yourself when was the last time you actually used the thing?  I think people like the idea of a fireplace far more than the actual fireplace itself.  Maybe its the primal nature of the thing, maybe it reminds us of some distant past when we needed a fireplace to cook and keep us warm, maybe its nostalgia…

But hey, it is an item whose time has past.  Given the efficiencies available in modern HVAC systems, coupled with the really excellent insulation options now available, fireplaces are just very last century.  I am not going to even go down the whole “Burning things is bad” argument – rather I am going to just talk about the space itself.  If you are doing a remodel, ask yourself if you need that space?  Oftentimes the fireplace dictates how a room flows, restricts how you arrange your furniture, how you use a room, and for what?  The one or two times a year you might take a match to the palace, if even that much?  I find fireplaces to be a waste of space.  They unbalance a living room, dictate focal points that don’t need to be there and limit your flexibility, all of which runs counterproductive to the most efficient use of a space, which is one of the keys to sustainable living.  So if your doing a remodel, here is a radical idea, ask yourself if you really need a fireplace, does it really add value to the home, or are you better off without it?  The planet is, of that I am certain.

{ 0 comments }

I was with my kids over the weekend at a Track & Field meet for the San Francisco CYO (Catholic Youth Organziation) – fun fact about Mr Sustainable, he Coaches Track and Cross Country at Saint Ignatius…anyhoo I am at the meet watching 3rd through 8th graders run, throw and jump and I was struck by how great they all were.  Rising CO2 levels were not on their plates, for them it was the sheer joy of testing their athletic abilities, seeing how far, how was, how long.  Youth really is a gift, though I disagree with George Bernard Shaw’s flippant “youth is wasted on the young” line.  When we age we shoulder our responsibilities as we rightly should, and if we can buffer our children from the malestorm for a time, so be it.

While I clearly feel this blog is the finest on the planet, this morning over my light & sweet java I was revisiting Grist – a damn fine site for green news on topics other than building, and I was impressed.  I havent a clue how the newspaper industry turmoil is going to shake out, but I suspect that places like Grist, Huffpo, and SustainableSchmidt will probalby be the future of new news.  If nothing less a lot of trees won’tbe chopped down for newsprint.  Now if only someone smarter than me can figure out how to save the jobs of these really top notch journalists and support staff and get their excellent content here as primary source material, that would be something.

{ 0 comments }

My garbage bill came the other day, and I was looking over the flier they sent with it.  It makes me proud to live in San Francisco, as our garbage/recycling/composting program is very impressive.  I pay $24.76 a month, and I am satisfied.  Garbage and waste disposal is a fundamental global urban problem – some landfills like Fresh Kills in New York are so massive they can be seen from space.  Proper disposal is one major key to sustainable living.  Here are some benchmarks that the city and county of San Francisco has achieved over the last 20 years of work:

1989: Curbside recycling starts in SF

1995: SF exceeds the state mandate of 25% waste diversion from landfills

2000: City meets state mandate of 50% diversion from landfills

2001: City adds residential and commercial composting (green carts) and changes the old blue bins to new blue carts; items accepted for recycling continues to expand.  My black cart starts getting really light!

2006: SF City ordinance mandates that all Construction & Demolition debris be sorted by a registered facility that can process mixed waste and divert a minimum of 65% from the landfill.  SF Achieves 70% landfill diversion.

It is an impressive and only partial list.  Composting is the really bright spot as it is processed and reused by local agriculture, as opposed to some of the recycled items that get shipped overseas for processing.  Too bad we don’t have someone clever here who can figure out a way to make money by turning paper into insulation LOCALLY.  I bet that person would not only save the planet, make a good living, and employ people, he or she would also become a paragon of virtue, be envied by the community, and even get a profile here at SS…

Here is a great guerrilla video to end on =)

{ 0 comments }